Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Pentagon Leaders Honor Excellence in Acquisition


By Nick Simeone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Dec. 9, 2014 - The 2014 Defense Acquisition Workforce Awards were handed out today during a Pentagon ceremony in which the department's leadership honored those who through acquisition excellence, provide outstanding support to the warfighter.

"Recognizing our professionals and the great work they do is really important," Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Frank Kindall told award recipients, who are among the more than 150,000 civilian and military members that make up the department's acquisition workforce.

Navy Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was also on hand to present awards to staff who, he said, "based on our dreams and your dreams design, produce and ultimately, hopefully on cost and on schedule and on performance, do the very critical part of logistic support... the kinds of things that people who wear the uniform like me have to use out there defending our country."

The following categories and individuals were recognized for outstanding service:

-- Requirements Management: Diane Baker, U.S. Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, for "exemplifying excellence in requirements management through the study and implementation of cost capability analysis for the Air Force."

-- Acquisition in an Expeditionary Environment: Matthew A. Mclean, U.S. Air Force, 10th Contracting Squadron, U.S. Air Force Academy for "outstanding mission support to U.S. Central Command."

-- Auditing: Robert F. LeJeune, Defense Contract Audit Agency, for "outstanding contributions to the acquisition process and his ultimate support of the warfighter and protection of the taxpayer."

-- Business: Maryellen Lukac, U.S. Army, for among other things, providing "essential acquisition and funding direction in the accomplishment of the urgent production and delivery of 918 60mm mortar systems to the Afghan national army within seven months from request."

-- Contracting and Procurement: Patricia A. Watson, Washington Headquarters Services Acquisition Directorate, for her "stellar commitment to increasing contract quality and to developing the professional acquisition competencies of over 115 contracting professionals within WHS/AD."

-- Earned Value Management: David Kester, Defense Contract Management Agency, for among other things "leadership and courage in confronting the lack of consistency, standardization and transparency" of a DCMA management system.

-- Engineering: Daniel Dittenber, U.S. Army, for among other things implementing "innovative solutions to dramatically improve readiness and sustainability while simultaneously improving performance capabilities';

-- Facilities Engineering: Leland "Allen" Fincham, Directorate of Public Works, Joint Munitions Command, Blue Grass Army Depot, Richmond, Kentucky, for among other things "ensuring that facilities are maintained, improved and operated in such a way as to minimize mission impacts" while taking "stellar care of employees."

-- Information Technology: Edward Lane, National Reconnaissance Office, for changing "how the NRO, Department of Defense and intelligence community acquire information-sharing capabilities that meet the needs of our nation's decision makers."

-- Life Cycle Logistics: Kevin Cormier, U.S. Navy, for among other things contributing "directly and significantly to sustaining the affordability of DoD's most complex weapons system."

-- Production, Quality and Manufacturing: John Graham, Defense Contract Management Agency, for "exhibiting the highest levels of excellence in the acquisition of products and services in support of the warfighter and protection of taxpayer resources."

-- Program Management: Thu Van Hendrey, U.S. Navy, for among other things, establishing "rigorous processes to ensure the prime contractor's integration and testing program scrupulously supported the program's operational requirements."

-- Science and Technology Manager: Maj. Christopher Schlagheck, U.S. Air Force, Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, for managing a $30 million space threat microsatellite program during a period in which he "significantly advanced the state of the art for this nation's space defense posture."

-- Services Acquisition: Steven R. Lahr, U.S. Air Force, Air Combat Command's Acquisition Management and Integration Center, for among other things "leading the way in implementing the Better Buying Power 2.0 philosophy."

-- Small Business: Crystal Ober, Defense Logistics Agency, for having a "profound effect on DLA aviation by increasing small business participation from 22.4 percent in fiscal year 2012 to 30.7 percent in FY14."

-- Test and Evaluation: Steven Schroeder, U.S. Navy, for "demonstrating exceptional leadership through his management of the Joint High Speed Vessel Test Team."

In addition to the awards for individual achievement, employees at the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division were honored with the Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Award for "achieving excellence in developing acquisition professionals."

Also receiving the award:

-- The Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Business Financial Management Competency;

-- The 448th Supply Chain Management Wing/ 431st Supply Chain Management Squadron;

-- The Special Operations Research, Development and Acquisition Center, U.S. Special Operations Command;

-- Army Contracting Command; and

-- The Acquisition Excellence and Program Execution Directorate, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Air Force Materiel Command.

DEE GORDON AND LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION (LADF) WILL VISIT UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TO PARTICIPATE IN BREAKFAST IN THE CLASSROOM TOMORROW

LOS ANGELES – Dodger infielder Dee Gordon will visit Union Elementary Schoolat 7:51 a.m. tomorrow, as part of a partnership between the LA Fund For Public Education (LA Fund) and the Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation (LADF) in support of the School Fuel program. Earlier this year, LADF committed $200,000 to School Fuel, a program now in its third year that provides universal breakfast to nearly half a million students in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). LADF’s support of the program includes classroom distribution of 24 million breakfast trays and more than six million Dodger milk cartons per month featuring Carl Crawford, Andre Ethier, Dee Gordon, Clayton Kershaw and Hyun-Jin Ryu.

“As part of our Season of Giving, LADF is pleased to make a school visit with Dee in support of our partner LA Fund and the School Fuel program,” said LADF Executive Nichol Whiteman. “We look forward to continuing this collaboration that has the potential to impact the lives of more than 650,000 LAUSD students and their families.”

LADF is the exclusive sports team partner of School Fuel. In 2012, the LA Fund, in partnership with LAUSD, launched the School Fuel initiative with the Breakfast in the Classroom program to eliminate the stigma associated with receiving free or reduced breakfast. This program has championed the addition of more nutritious options for the students, as well as created and provided a nutrition education program for students and their families. Before breakfast in the classroom began, only 29 percent of all LAUSD students eligible for free or reduced breakfast participated and today over 400,000 students enjoy the breakfast in the classroom program, an increase of more than 200,000 students.

“The generous support of the Dodgers Foundation has allowed LAUSD and the LA Fund to grow the Breakfast in the Classroom program and provide more than 400,000 students with a healthy breakfast at the start of the school day,” said Megan Chernin, CEO of the LA Fund. “Students can learn when they aren't hungry.  Plus, there are other added benefits when students share a meal with their classmates and teachers and experience a real sense of community. Having Dodgers players on the LAUSD milk cartons has brought a new excitement to the breakfast in the classroom experience. We highly value the support and innovative spirit of the Dodger Foundation and look forward to continuing to work with them to improve the educational outcomes of LAUSD students.”

Gordon will join a 5th grade class at Union Elementary School and begin the event by leading the classroom in a brief fitness routine along with Dodger Trainer Chris Dunaway and share with the students his warm-up exercises he uses before games. After that, Gordon will have breakfast with the students and talk about healthy habits and the importance of succeeding in school. Students will get the opportunity to have a Q&A session with Gordon and will take a class photo with him.

For more information on LADF, please visitwww.dodgers.com/LADF. Media interested in attending Gordon’s visit to Union Elementary School tomorrow should contact the Dodgers’ PR department by replying to this email or by calling (323) 224-1301.

About LA Fund For Public Education

Founded in 2011 by Superintendent Dr. John Deasy and Education Activist Megan Chernin, the LA Fund for Public Education invests in results-oriented programs designed to ensure that every student in the nation’s second largest school system has the chance to succeed.

The LA Fund builds innovative partnerships to create solutions that will improve the educational and social outcomes for students in the LAUSD. Through collaboration and creativity, they inspire action and achieve impact. LA Fund is positioned to lead scalable innovations that reach all corners of Los Angeles. Working directly with classroom teachers as well as district leadership, the LA Fund has a proven track record of creating meaningful systemic change in the second largest school system.

The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation is the official team charity of the Los Angeles Dodgers. Its primary focus is to support cornerstone programs in Sports + Recreation, Education + Literacy and Health + Wellness benefitting children and families in need throughout the greater Los Angeles region. By leveraging strategic partnerships, the mission is to harness the power of the Dodger brand and the passion our fans have for Los Angeles into a vehicle for positive change in under-served communities. Visit the Dodgers online atwww.dodgers.com, follow them on Twitter@Dodgers and like them on Facebook atwww.facebook.com/Dodgers.

SHOW SMILES


12/09/2014 05:02 PM CST

U.S. Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and his wife, Deanie, listen to the USO holiday show at Bagram Airfield, Afghanistan, Dec. 8, 2014.

Monday, December 8, 2014

Military Takes Precautions as Senate Interrogation Report Nears


By Nick Simeone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Dec. 8, 2014 - U.S. military leaders are taking appropriate force-protection measures in case there is unrest caused by the release of a controversial Senate report on CIA interrogation techniques used in the days after the 9/11 attacks, a Pentagon spokesman said today.

In light of that, Army Col. Steve Warren said, the Defense Department has directed U.S. combatant commands worldwide to brace for the possibility of violence directed at U.S personnel and facilities.

"There is certainly the possibility that the release of this report could cause unrest," he said, "and therefore, [DoD] has directed the combatant commands to take appropriate force-protection measures."

Warren spoke ahead of the Senate Intelligence Committee's expected release of a declassified report several-thousand pages long that is reported to be sharply critical of interrogation techniques used by the CIA against captured terrorism suspects in the years immediately following the 9/11 attacks.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers said yesterday that foreign leaders have told the United States that the release of the report is likely to spark violence, and Secretary of State John F. Kerry has issued a similar warning.

KUWAIT MEETING


12/08/2014 12:57 PM CST

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, left, meets with Kuwaiti Amir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jabir al-Sabah, right, at the Safir Palace in Kuwait City, Kuwait, Dec. 8, 2014,

KUWAIT TALK


12/08/2014 12:58 PM CST

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel addresses U.S. service members during a visit on Camp Beuhring, Kuwait, Dec. 8, 2014.

Sunday, December 7, 2014

Detainee Transfer Announced



The Department of Defense announced today the transfer of Ahmed Adnan Ahjam, Ali Hussain Shaabaan, Omar Mahmoud Faraj, Abdul Bin Mohammed Abis Ourgy, Mohammed Tahanmatan, and Jihad Diyab from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay to the Government of Uruguay.

As directed by the president's Jan. 22, 2009, executive order, the interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force conducted a comprehensive review of this case. As a result of that review, which examined a number of factors, including security issues, these men were unanimously approved for transfer by the six departments and agencies comprising the task force.

In accordance with statutory requirements, the secretary of defense informed Congress of the United States' intent to transfer these individuals and of his determination that this transfer meets the statutory standard.

The United States is grateful to the Government of Uruguay for its willingness to support ongoing U.S. efforts to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The United States coordinated with the Government of Uruguay to ensure these transfers took place consistent with appropriate security and humane treatment measures.

Today, 136 detainees remain at Guantanamo Bay.

U.S. Presence at Spanish Base Continues to Grow


By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Dec. 7, 2014 - The American strategy calling for increased attention to the Asia-Pacific region does not mean other areas of the world are less important to U.S. interests and the growth of the naval base here is a case in point.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
The guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook is underway in the Mediterranean Sea, Dec. 5, 2014. Donald Cook is conducting naval operations in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility in support of U.S. national security interests in Europe. U.S. Navy photo by Petty Officer 2nd Class John Herman
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

In 2010, the NATO allies agreed to increase ballistic missile protection for Europe. Two American Aegis-equipped frigates now call Rota home and two more are scheduled to join them next year.

These are the first American ships home-ported here since Polaris-missile submarines left in the 1970s, U.S. base officials said.

Guarding Against Missile Attack, Pirates

Rota is key real estate, said Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Dempsey led a USO troupe to the base and visited with sailors aboard the USS Donald K. Ross. Rota's harbor is on the Atlantic side of the Strait of Gibraltar and the ships typically are considered U.S. 6th Fleet assets which travel the Mediterranean Sea. The forward-deployed U.S. ships guard against a ballistic missile attack on NATO allies from the Middle East.

Rota-ported U.S. ships and crews "also participate in multinational exercises," said Navy Capt. Greg Pekari, the commander of Naval Station Rota.

"They [also] are doing anti-piracy operations," Pekari added. "They are doing whatever the U.S. and NATO need to do to protect and guard our allies."

Close to Libya, West Africa

U.S. ships based here have a proximity to hot spots like Libya and West Africa, officials said. They are also closer to the Black Sea that the USS Ross entered in September to reassure NATO allies in the wake of Russia's annexation of Crimea and its aggression in eastern Ukraine.

"There are still a lot of things happening here that requires our attention -- Syria, ISIL, Ukraine," Pekari said.

"We still have requirements around the world," he added, noting the ship borne ballistic missile defense assets ported at Rota have a role in meeting those security requirements.

Officials said about 300 Air Force personnel work at Rota, handling maintenance on C-5 Galaxy and C-17 Globemaster 3 aircraft that use the base's airport.

'Gateway to the Mediterranean'

The Spanish navy hosts the American ships and presence, and sailors and their families home-ported here "hit the jackpot," according to Pekari.

Officials said the addition of the ships means the base -- billed as the Gateway to the Mediterranean -- is growing. There are currently around 4,000 U.S. service members in more than 30 organizations and their families on base.

Each ship has about 300 sailors assigned, officials said. The number of family members that will arrive is around 400 per ship. "The expectation is we are going to increase by 2,500 to 3,000 Americans over the next couple of years," Pekari said.

Impacts Base Infrastructure

This is a major increase that will impact the base's infrastructure, Pekari said, including schools, shopping, the base hospital, maintenance facilities, and contractor support. He said support from the Spanish admiral who manages the base has been first rate and cooperation throughout the Iberian Peninsula has been outstanding.

It will take a couple of years for the base population to build, the captain said, and this is giving U.S. and Spanish officials the opportunity to plan the expansion carefully.

"First-term sailors coming here may not realize how good a base this is to come to because they have nothing to compare it to," Pekari said. "Don't get me wrong; they will work hard here. But once work is over, the area and the chance to experience Spanish culture make this area an incredible opportunity."

Six Guantanamo Detainees Transfer to Uruguay


DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Dec. 7, 2014 - The Department of Defense announced the transfer of Ahmed Adnan Ahjam, Ali Hussain Shaabaan, Omar Mahmoud Faraj, Abdul Bin Mohammed Abis Ourgy, Mohammed Tahanmatan, and Jihad Diyab from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the government of Uruguay, according to a DoD news release issued today.

As directed by the president's Jan. 22, 2009, executive order, the interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force conducted a comprehensive review of this case, the release said. As a result of that review, which examined a number of factors, including security issues, these men were unanimously approved for transfer by the six departments and agencies comprising the task force.

In accordance with statutory requirements, the secretary of defense informed Congress of the United States' intent to transfer these individuals and of his determination that this transfer meets the statutory standard, according to the release.

"The United States is grateful to the government of Uruguay for its willingness to support ongoing U.S. efforts to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility," the release said. "The United States coordinated with the government of Uruguay to ensure these transfers took place consistent with appropriate security and humane treatment measures.

CHAIRMAN SELFIE


12/07/2014 08:24 AM CST

U.S. Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, takes a photo with a U.S. sailor while aboard the USS Ross on Naval Station Rota, Spain, Dec. 6, 2014. Dempsey is visiting U.S. service members who are deployed outside the United States during the holidays.

USO TOUR


12/07/2014 09:22 AM CST

U.S. Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and his wife, Deanie, open a USO show for U.S. service members and their families on Naval Station Rota, Spain, Dec. 6, 2014. Dempsey is visiting U.S. service members who are deployed outside the United States during the holidays.

The last light of the day turns the sky pink over Mount Rainier...


The last light of the day turns the sky pink over Mount Rainier National Park in Washington. Pictured here are the Tatoosh Range and Mount Adams at sunset as seen from the park’s Skyline Trail.
Photo by Justin Marx 

Dempsey, USO Troupe Visit Troops in Vicenza


By Jim Garamone
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

VICENZA, Italy, Dec. 7, 2014 - Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey and his traveling USO troupe visited the soldiers of the 173rd Airborne Brigade and U.S. Army Africa here today.

Troops here have been busy for the last year -- regionally and globally, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said.

Demonstrating U.S. Resolve

The 173rd has been focused for years on Iraq and Afghanistan, Dempsey said in an interview. And, when Russia annexed Crimea and threatened eastern Ukraine, the 173rd's soldiers parachuted into the Baltic republics, Poland and Ukraine to show American resolve in face of the Russian adventurism.

The chairman said he viewed a video depicting American soldiers putting on a Soapbox Derby with some local children.

"That was a great idea," Dempsey said.

He alluded to the saying about American service members being "no worse enemy, no better friend."

"When you think about it, that's what makes us who we are -- we can jump out of an airplane and kill you with a bayonet or help you build a soapbox car -- you make the call," Dempsey said.

Engaged With Allies, Partners

American actions in Europe and Africa show the United States is committed to allies, the chairman said. "We don't just sit back in Fortress America protected by two oceans and just allow the world to have its own problems," he said. "We're actually out and about with partners and allies and other militaries and building relationships. The 173rd and U.S. Army Africa are an integral part of that.

The 173rd is the only forward-deployed U.S. airborne brigade, Dempsey said.

"It can be where it's needed more quickly," the chairman said. "And it also send a message to potential adversaries that they don't have time in which they can shape things to their benefit. We'll be there pretty quickly."

USO Holiday Tour Tradition

This is the chairman's fourth holiday USO trip. Glee star Dianna Agron, Suits star Meghan Markle, actor, comedian and retired Marine Corps lieutenant colonel Rob Riggle, retired Chicago Bears linebacker Brian Urlacher, Washington Nationals pitcher Doug Fister and -- making her ninth USO tour -- country singer Kellie Pickler, accompanied Dempsey on the current USO tour.

In addition to entertaining the troops and their families, the visit gives Dempsey and his wife, Deanie, the chance to connect with overseas-deployed service members.

"We come in the service and then we ask a lot of you -- we deploy you and the pace is really remarkable," he said. "So it is really important that I get out and find out what's on your mind and the minds of your family members so that I can turn that into strategy and policy and resource decisions back in Washington."


KUWAIT ARRIVAL


12/07/2014 04:23 PM CST

U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, center right, walks with Kuwaiti Army Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Mohammad Al-Khoder as he arrives at the Kuwait International Airport, Kuwait, Dec. 7, 2014.

Transcript With Chuck Hagel


SEC. HAGEL: Hello, hello, hello.

STAFF: Okay, Dan.

Q: Secretary, so there have been three failed rescue operations in basically a few months. Do you think it's time to have some kind of a review -- a review to look at how intelligence is gathered, how the raids are conducted?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, first as I said yesterday, no rescue mission is ever recommended to the president by any of us on the National Security Council unless there is a complete, thorough internal review of intelligence, of what we know, also what we don't know. And as I noted yesterday, that's one component.

And then what would it take, if the intelligence matches up with an operational plan? Then of course you start with the real question, how much risk do we believe that the hostage is in?

Is the hostage's life being threatened, based on our best intelligence? Is it imminent? How much time do we have? Are there other ways that we can get the hostage back?

There's an immense about of focus and time in review that goes into each of these operations. So I don't think it's a matter of going back and having a review of a process. Our process is about as thorough as there can be.

Is it imperfect? Yes. Is there risk? Yes. But we start with the fact that we have an American that's being held hostage and that American's life is in danger. That's where we start. And then we proceed from there.

Q: Is there maybe a more aggressive policy now from the United States in terms of going after hostage takers?

SEC. HAGEL: I don't think there's been a less aggressive or a more aggressive. I mean it's still a policy of the United States, always has been, to get our hostages back. I mean that hasn't changed administration after administration. The same components, regardless of the administration or the year or the circumstances, the same components go into analyzing the possibility of action as we've always had.

Is our intelligence more sophisticated today and technology has brought more to it? Sure. But you know the reality is that human intelligence is always the best intelligence. And you never have enough human intelligence.

So I don't think it's a matter of more aggressive or less aggressive. It's always been the policy of the United States of America to get its hostages back.

Q: Sir, how do you feel -- I was just wondering about your emotions here? I mean obviously it's going to be likely to be your last visit as SecDef. What's going through your mind? Is there a bit of sadness here to see these guys? And as a combat veteran as well, the continuity's got to seem -- you seem to be a little bit more at ease.

SEC. HAGEL: Well, I'm enlisted so I'm always at ease. But well you started with -- it isn't just today. Every part of my life since I came back from Vietnam I have been close to military guys.

And it isn't just me. It's anyone who's ever been to war. Anyone who's ever watched the suffering and literally been in trenches and jungles and foxholes and mountaintops with men and women who look after each other and save each other's lives.

So that component doesn't change. So I've always been very close and feel close, do today, always have.

I always have enjoyed the two years I served as the secretary of defense of getting out and doing these kinds of things. Many of you have traveled with me all over and you know I do this everywhere I go because I -- it isn't just a matter I like it, but it's, I think, part of the responsibilities of this job too.

Do I connect with them? I do. I'm proud of that. Sure, it's something that -- I've had this opportunity, this great privilege the last two years to see them up close in unique ways that most people never have.

So I always take away from any job or any experience the most positive parts of that and build on that for my future. And it's always worked for me. And these are special, special people and you all know that. So I admire them and I always like to be around them.

Q: Is there a sadness, though, about this being your last visit here?

SEC. HAGEL: Yeah. Well, I think there's always an emotional piece of this that you can't help but have that with the kind of bond that I have with these people, that anybody has, as I said, with military men and women, been to war, share that bond, share that relationship.

So, but I don't think about that. I really don't. I don't stand up here and talk to these guys and think oh this will be my last time with them. That's not what goes through my mind.

I always think ahead. And I think about these guys. And you know will it -- we'll always concentrate on these guys. It started long before me.

Q: Mr. Hagel, you said that Iraq and Afghanistan were different situations. And it's true that the attitude of the government in Afghanistan is very different than Mr. Maliki's government.

But the drawdown you've got outlined over the next two years from 10,000 to just a small number in Kabul is not going to be that different than the number we left in Iraq. And why should we expect a different situation here than we saw in Iraq after we pulled out the majority of our troops?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, Julian, let's go back to the beginning and the premise of the point. The premise of the point, we left Iraq under totally different circumstances. And we're transitioning out of Afghanistan over the next two years.

First of all, this transition was with the agreement and the invitation of the Afghan people and the Afghan government. This is a transition with our closest 50 partners over the next two years after we continue to help the Afghans build their capacity, build out that capability, build their institutions, train, assist and advise.

That's totally different than how we left Iraq. As we get into the second year of the transition, 2016, this has been planned, we bring those troops down because that won't be -- our role will be different. We'll be working ourselves out of a job.

General Campbell talks about that. All our commanders who were there. That's the whole point of this. And this will be 15 years at the end of 2016 that we've had very active military roles here. Thirteen of those have been combat roles. The last two have been train, assist, advise and working through this.

So I see it as a fundamentally different set of dynamics here. It's planning. It's training. It's transitioning. It's in agreement with everybody knowing what the objectives are every month as we transition out and help build their capacity.

STAFF: This is going to be the last one.

Q: If the drawdown plan for Afghanistan was kind of on a Karzai era. And I think we've heard even from last night from President Ghani like it's a new era. He talks about even American forces here in a totally different way than Karzai did.

I mean even in your conversations in Kabul this trip you get a sense that the drawdown plan is not -- doesn't fit now the current situation...

SEC. HAGEL: Oh, no. No.

STAFF: Mr. Secretary, just hold just a second, please. Just one second.

Q: It's changed really.

SEC. HAGEL: No, it hasn't actually, not the plan or the agreement. I'll give you a very real example of that.

Yes, we had a transition of governments or presidents from Karzai to Ghani. Let's start with Karzai. As that transition went forward, President Karzai took the bilateral security agreement to the Loya Jirga that he called and endorsed it to the Loya Jirga.

Now, there were intervening dynamics after that. I get that. He has now transitioned out. A new president is in.

This new president Ghani picks up the bilateral security agreement, picks up the train and assist mission just like it was, endorsed it. He did it as a candidate, as did Dr. Abdullah.

So there's no shift just because you have governments that -- one government wants to change it and the other one doesn't, not at all. There's no shift in that.

Q: In your conversations here you didn't get a sense from the new Afghan government that they are concerned about the drawdown plan that the U.S. is being sweated to execute?

SEC. HAGEL: They help facilitate and work out the agreement, along with General (inaudible) and I talked about it. Their corps commanders, their commander, General Karimi and I spent time yesterday talking about it.

They helped write the plan. And they understand it better than anybody because they want to have the capability to be able to do on their own without us having that constant we're the backup, call us in.

Give you another example of that. I used this before and I do think it gets underplayed.

It was a big deal about these elections these year. It was clear the Taliban, Al-Qaeda wanted to, said so that they would disrupt it, do everything they could. Iraqi Security Force -- or the Afghan Security Forces independently assured those elections.

And I think that's a pretty significant testament to the capability of the Afghan Security Forces and the people of Afghanistan wanting this to go forward, and everybody being in general agreement about our role and our ISAF partners' role as we go into resolute support mission objectives after Jan. 1. So I think there's really no change in any of the commitments of where we want to go and the objective of the mission.

STAFF: Thanks, guys. We're going to have to end there.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you. Okay. We'll see you in Kuwait.

Remarks by Secretary Hagel to Troops at Forward Operating Base Gamberi, Afghanistan



SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL: Everybody got a chair? If you don't want to sit down, stand up. Or sit down. This is not a lecture. Nobody's going to be graded.

First I want to thank you all. Thank you for giving me some time today to come by and say hello and to pass on not just my gratitude, but the president of the United States, the people of America. Everyone supports what you're doing, supports you personally, your families.

All Americans understand the sacrifices you make, your families, what you mean to our country. And as we move into a holiday season I know it's particularly difficult because you won't be with your families.

So I want to wish you an early happy holidays and to your families. And please convey to your families how much we appreciate them and the sacrifice they're making too not being with all of you on this upcoming holiday.

So I want to acknowledge not only General Bentley for his leadership and his leadership team, but also General Campbell for what he is doing and what he has been doing here, and all of our leadership.

I brought with me the former commander of the 3rd ID, General Abrams, who spent quite a bit of time in Afghanistan over the years.

So I think many of you actually served with Abe over the years and served in the 3rd ID with him and probably other places. So take credit that you made him what he is today. And we're very proud of General Abrams, as we are proud of all of you.

I know we've got some ISAF Polish partners and troops with us. Guys, thank you. We also appreciate what you do, and your partnership, your friendship and what you mean to this effort. And I know how proud your country is of your efforts. And I think I'll have a couple of minutes here later this afternoon to stop by and personally thank you.

I'm here for a couple of days and then onto some other areas. And I wanted to spend some time here.

This is my fourth trip as secretary of defense. Because as we work our way essentially out of a job, as we transition from the combat roles that we've had over the last 13 years into train, assist and advise, it's important that all of our leaders get a better understanding of not just how it's going, what your concerns are.

I have had an opportunity to meet with General Waziri this morning and his senior commanders, which I valued very much and appreciated his time to take us through this. Because how we do this and what we accomplish, all of us together working toward the same objective is really important, especially over the next couple of years as this transition takes effect.

And I wanted to listen also to the Afghan leaders. General Campbell and I met with President Ghani yesterday and spent quite a bit of time with him as well as CEO Dr. Abdullah on getting his thoughts on the transition.

And this area, this core, this base, what you all do in this area has really developed into a model for how we'll continue to do this with our ISAF partners, with the Afghan Security Forces. And I do think it's important that we acknowledge. And I know you do and you all see it, the tremendous progress that has been made here in this country over the last 13 years, measurable in many tangible ways, certainly with the Afghan Security Forces.

I mentioned yesterday in a news conference with President Ghani that the first time I came to Afghanistan was I think it was the first congressional delegation that came into Afghanistan. It was in late January of 2002. And I'd been here a number of times since.

So I have some frame of reference and some perspective to at least make some analysis on progress. And we don't want to see the tremendous progress that's been accomplished through so much of the Afghan people, our involvement, the sacrifices the United States and our ISAF partners have made in blood, in treasure.

We don't want to see that roll back downhill. There's progress. We want to do everything we can to continue to support the Afghan people because after all, this is about their future.

It is about the future of Afghanistan, what kind of a country they want for their children, what kind of values is important to them and how they want to live their lives. And I think we as Americans have a particular appreciation for that. Our Polish colleagues understand an awful lot about that, what they have endured over different periods of time.

So we're all in this together. And we want to make sure we maximize the value added that we all bring to this and investments that we've all made in this. And so I particularly note your role in this because it really is a model of how we can do this.

Now, there are challenges ahead. The job's not over. This is still a dangerous country in many ways. But you don't measure life based on one day at a time or one, even one year at a time.

It's an overall measurement of are we moving in the right direction. Is there progress? Is this country better off than it was five years ago or three years ago or certainly 13 years ago? And I think when we apply those kinds of metrics it's pretty clear what the answers are. So thank you for what you're doing.

The world is an uncertain place. And I think you all are well aware of that. You have your own perspectives.

Some of you have -- many of you have served in this country before. Some of you I know are on your second, third or even some fourth tour veterans here. You served in other parts of the world. So you understand the challenges that we are all dealing with all across the globe.

But I look at long-term trends. And I think that's what we always have to look at. As Franklin Roosevelt once said, "the long pole of history are the trends in the right direction." And there's never been a time in history that there has not been a serious challenge.

Not only to freedom, but to people's rights and respect of individuals and the things, again, that we all of us value and that we want certainly for ourselves and for our families and for our children. But also recognizing that other people all over the world want that as well.

So let me stop there and again wish all of you a wonderful holiday. You have each other. That's not insignificant.

I, long ago when dinosaurs roamed the earth, spent a year in an army uniform in a war away from home during the holidays. So I have some appreciation for what you deal with and what your families deal with and the sacrifices they make.

So please pass onto your families our warmest holiday wishes. Take care of yourselves. And again, tell your families how much we appreciate what they do. And of course we appreciate what you do and how proud we all are of all of you and your families. So thank you.

I'll be glad to take some questions. Anything that you all want to talk about.

STAFF: I've got some stuff on my mind, so.

SEC. HAGEL: Well, I would be disappointed if they didn't.

If you guys just -- probably the easiest way to do it is just if you got a question you want to say something just go up to the mic. Go ahead.

Q: Okay, sir. Given our current mission...

SEC. HAGEL: Who are you?

Q: I'm Staff Sergeant Farley, originally from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

SEC. HAGEL: That's good enough.

Q: Okay.

SEC. HAGEL: Okay.

Q: Given our current mission here in Afghanistan of train, advise and assist, and it's also going on in Iraq and Africa, do you think the train, advise, assist skillset will gain a wider emphasis for development among conventional forces and expand it around the world?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, I think the answer -- the quick answer is yes. And why do I think that?

Again, when you look at the objectives of a mission, and you all know all about that because you are mission oriented. And you know how to carry out a mission. You know the operation of a mission. You know what it takes to accomplish a mission.

When you look at objectives of train, assist, advise, what is the point? What's behind all that?

Well, what's behind all that, just as what we're doing here and we've done in other countries, we'll do in more countries, is to assist a country, specifically security forces of a country, build their own capability, build their own capacity to defend themselves, secure their country, allow their country opportunities of possibility and prosperity. And we can do that. We do that very well.

I think the testament of that is pretty clear. We've been working with nearly 50 ISAF countries in this country for the last few years. Now as we transition to a new mission that we support, most of those 50 nations will stay in a train, assist and advise capacity over the next two years.

And it is to help the host country, a country that has invited us all in, the country of Afghanistan, to continue to help them, support them. But not fight for them.

Not do their work for them, but to assist them, advise them, support them, train them, give them the tools and the capacity and the capabilities, the leadership, the training, the institutions. Help them with that so they can become independent and they can do what they need to do to secure their country.

So yes, I think these are areas that are going to I believe become more and more important for our country. We're doing this with partners all over the world. This is the most focused example of that for obvious reasons, what we're doing here in Afghanistan. Thank you.

Q: Thank you.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you.

Q: Mr. Secretary, my name's Staff Sergeant Harcourt . And I'm from the sergeant's sister city in the great state of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Pa. I...

SEC. HAGEL: Do you guys get along? Do you talk?

Q: Never met until today.

SEC. HAGEL: See how we bring people together here.

Q: I earned my master's degree in history from Duquesne University in Pittsburgh. And you mentioned in your talk about modernity and change and how that goes and changing -- in a changing world, and how that matters.

And from a historical perspective I was just curious. Given the deteriorated security situation in Iraq, how, if at all does that factor into our current foreign policy in deciding our withdrawal process here in Afghanistan, sir?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, it's a good question. It would be a question coming from a major of history like you that would be obvious. But let me try and respond this way because you already know an awful lot about history you have, I'm sure, an answer to your question.

But I think a couple of things need to be said in answer to your question. First, Iraq and Afghanistan are totally different situations. And you all understand that. Many of you served in Iraq.

So that's where you start. There are some similarities, sure. Our role is different in Iraq as it is here. And Iraq has been an ally. We, as you all know and many of you serve there, invested our blood and our treasure there to help the Iraqi people.

But in the end it's really much about the question of missions and objectives. In the end each country must take the responsibility for their own futures and for their own fate and for governing themselves.

We help allies all over the world different ways, different situations and different locations. And I think the Iraq-Afghanistan situation is one of those where it's different. It's totally different than -- I think probably more different than similarities.

But yes, some similar threats: terrorism. Some of the same factors, some of the same organizations that wanted to do everything they can to destroy the United States as well as Western values and Western civilization.

So there are common interests. There are common challenges. But how we work and cooperate with other countries is always -- is always a little different. And I think that in this case that's the case.

Q: Thank you, sir.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you.

Q: Good morning, sir. Second Lieutenant Stephandorf. I'm from Brooklyn, New York. Sir, have there been any recent changes to the reduction plan for the United States Army?

SEC. HAGEL: The reduction plan?

Q: Yes, sir.

SEC. HAGEL: No. I think you are all aware of our drawing down our force structure after 13 years of two long land-based conflicts that have required very significant numbers of Army, most specifically, Marines of course. But every service has been in it, but the Army has been the main manpower component of those two wars.

So, like history, when the United States cycles out of a war of our manpower needs, our force structures will level off and will be adjusted to not just the current threats, but always anticipated threats because only few of us would've predicted what the end of 2014 looks like right now versus how it started: Russia-Ukraine, ISIL, Ebola.

Those are but three. And all three have required new commitments of components of whether it's ready reaction or specific and active engagement of our army in West Africa, helping there.

So you always anticipate. But no, we'll stay on that drawdown path.

As you know the chief of staff of the Army, General Odierno, had come to me last year, actually a year ago, more than a year ago, as we were preparing budgets that we presented earlier this year. He presented to Chairman Dempsey. I accepted Chief of Staff Odierno's recommendations as to how we would continue to drawdown.

But an important part of that is the glide slope. And when the Army and all services had been hit particularly hard, and you all know this, the last couple of years. We've built back a little bit this year.

But last year was really, really a disastrous year for our services because we had to stop training and sailing and flying and defer maintenance and all the other things that go with it because of sequestration. We had a government shutdown for 16 days. We had to furlough civilians for five days. We took major abrupt, steep cuts in our budget because of sequestration.

Now, there was a budget agreement that put some of that back this year and going into next year. But sequestration is still the law of the land, and it will come back in 2016 unless the Congress changes the law.

So (inaudible) has done a brilliant job of being able to maintain their current force structure and their anticipated drawdown plans. But the chief has said, all of our chiefs have said if sequestration continues that will further mean those abrupt, steep cuts will require a sharper glide path down on force reduction.

So we're doing everything we can to see if we can get that turned around. But the number itself is not changing.

Q: Thank you very much, sir.

Q: Sir, 1st Class Rains from the San Diego area. Sir, with politicians continuing to cut our benefits such as proposed 1.8 percent pay raise down to 1 percent, and the reduction of basic allowance for housing, do you see a trend where at some point they might turn that around and start adding to our benefits instead of cutting, sir?

SEC. HAGEL: I don't speak for the Congress. I doubt that you're going to see a movement to add to benefits.

And I think again you need to review compensation benefits. Retirement. As you know of course, there's a commission that the Congress -- independent commission that the Congress empaneled that will report to the Congress early next year on recommendations on how we go forward, how our forces go forward under the current pay compensations benefits program.

Every chief of staff we have currently and past has said that the military enterprise cannot sustain the path we're on with the current structure, which includes everything.

Adjustments are going to have to be made because if they're not made down into the future then we will essentially end up with a hollow force. We will have a lot of benefits and pay, but there'll be no money for readiness.

The capacity capability, the edge that you now have and we have had since World War II won't be there. Unless the Congress wants to pass tens of billions of dollars in funding, more funding every year. I don't think that's going to happen.

No one questions or argues that our military should be absolutely compensated with an entire package that's appropriate for your service and your sacrifice. That's not the issue. But we're looking down into the future.

How do we sustain the kind of quality that we have now, recruitment, retention? And at the same time assure the capability of our forces with the readiness and the weapons systems and the technological edge that we've had?

So that's part of the debate. And it is really central to our future planning.

The Congress will come up next week with, I think, a National Defense Authorization Act which will address, maybe, a couple of these compensation issues. Maybe not. But I think at least what I've been told in many conversations I've had with members of Congress that they want to wait until the commission -- the independent commission comes back with its recommendations.

But again, just to make sure everybody's aware of this. And it's a huge point. It's one everybody agrees with.

No one disagrees that our men and women need to be fairly compensated for the tremendous sacrifice and service they give this country. That's not in question.

What's in question is how do we sustain this down the road? And I suspect as we get through this, and we will because we're going to have to. Because if you don't make these decisions now, at some point these decisions are going to have to be made.

I've never found the big decisions, the challenging -- the questions in life that they get better, they get easier to fix or they just go away. Maybe your lives are different. My live has never been that way. It doesn't happen.

So it means if we don't deal with this now, somebody's going to have to be dealing with it later. And there will be -- there'll be some decisions made that probably won't be right. So I'm hopeful that we'll get this right. Thank you.

Q: Thank you, sir.

SEC. HAGEL: Okay. John says -- oh. John says no more.

All right. We're going to -- if you guys want to do this we'll take a picture with everybody and I've got some coins, so. 

Saturday, December 6, 2014

Hagel Meets With Leaders, Troops in Afghanistan


By Army Sgt. 1st Class Tyrone C. Marshall Jr.
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Dec. 6, 2014 - In an unannounced visit to Afghanistan, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel today announced the delayed withdrawal of up to 1,000 U.S. troops from the country during the transition to Operation Resolute Support.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel visits U.S. service members at the International Security Assistance Force dining facility in Kabul, Afghanistan, Dec. 6, 2014. DoD photo by U.S. Air Force Master Sgt. Adrian Cadiz
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

Speaking during a joint press conference with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani in Kabul, Afghanistan's capital city, Hagel discussed the reason for the delayed withdrawal of some troops and the transition from NATO's International Security Assistance Force mission to Operation Resolute Support.

Delayed Withdrawal of Some Troops

"Last month, thanks to the leadership of President Ghani and [Chief Executive Officer] Dr. [Abdullah] Abdullah, the Afghan Parliament overwhelmingly approved the U.S.-Afghanistan Bilateral Security Agreement and the NATO Status of Forces Agreement," Hagel said. "However, because of prior delays in signing these agreements, the force generation effort for Resolute Support is several months behind where we hoped it would be at this time."

As a result of the delay, Hagel said, President Barack Obama provided U.S. military commanders with the flexibility to manage any temporary force shortfalls they might experience for a few months as coalition troops to arrive in theater.

"This will mean a delayed withdrawal of up to 1,000 U.S. troops," the defense secretary said, "so that up to 10,800 troops rather than 9,800 could remain in Afghanistan through the end of this year and through the first few months next year."

The president's authorization will not change, Hagel added, noting the troops' missions and the long-term timeline for our withdrawal also wouldn't change.

"As planned, Resolute Support will focus here in Kabul and Bagram with a limited regional presence," he said. "As part of this mission, the United States is prepared to provide limited combat enabler support to Afghan forces."

Missions Unchanged

Hagel said U.S. forces in Afghanistan would "always" have the right and the capacity to defend themselves against attacks.

"We're committed to preventing al Qaeda from using Afghanistan as a safe haven," Hagel said, to threaten the United States, the Afghan people, and other U.S. allies and partners.

Also, the United States will take appropriate measures against Taliban members who directly threaten U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan or provide direct support to al Qaeda, he added.

Progress in Afghanistan

Hagel said he has observed progress in Afghanistan during his time as defense secretary and earlier when he served in the U.S. Senate.

"I have seen, first-hand, over many years of visits to this country the enormous progress that this country has made in its development, in its democracy, in its possibilities and hope for all its people," Hagel said. "And that, I think, is further testimony to the strong partnership of our two countries."

Hagel said he and Afghanistan's leaders discussed the nation's progress and "the transition to new chapter in America's partnership with Afghanistan."

The defense secretary noted the importance of last summer's elections in Afghanistan, because Afghan security forces were "in the lead in defending their citizens and their country."

There's more to do and more challenges ahead, he said.

"But at the end of this month, ISAF's combat mission will come to an end, as everyone knows," Hagel said.

NATO coalition forces will transition to Operation Resolute Support, Hagel said, when they'll train, advise and assist Afghan forces as they assume full responsibility for their nation's security.

The coalition's new mission will be critical to Afghanistan's success, the defense secretary said.

Coalition Commitments

"This afternoon, President Ghani, Dr. Abdullah and I also discussed the important commitments made by coalition nations at this week's conferences in Brussels and London," Hagel said. "Between 2012 and 2015, the United States will have provided more than $8 billon in civilian assistance [to Afghanistan] and our commitment will be enduring."

Havel said recent Taliban attacks have made it clear that the international community must not waver in its support for a stable, secure and prosperous Afghanistan. The defense secretary also expressed his appreciation for troop sacrifices in Afghanistan.

"I want to recognize the tremendous service and sacrifices of not only our U.S. troops, but coalition troops and our partners in the Afghan National Security Forces," Hagel said. "Their commitment has forged a defining moment of opportunity for Afghanistan's future and for the people of Afghanistan."

Joint Press Conference by Secretary Hagel and President Ghani in Kabul, Afghanistan



PRESIDENT ASHRAF GHANI: (Speaking in foreign language).

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL: Thank you.

President Ghani, thank you. It is a privilege to be here with you and renew a friendship, as you have noted, that goes back many years. And I am particularly pleased that I am able to personally congratulate you on your new responsibilities.

I also want to note that Dr. Abdullah, the CEO of the new unity government, is an old friend. And I appreciated very much an opportunity to see him again and congratulate him as well.

I would like to make a brief comment at the front end of this press conference with President Ghani. And that is to address the murder of American citizen Luke Somers. I released a statement a couple of hours ago about Mr. Somers' death.


He was murdered during an attempt by American forces to rescue him from terrorist groups in Yemen. Our hearts are full of sorrowtonight. Our prayers and thoughts go out to the Somers family.

There was also another hostage who was also killed in that attempted rescue, and our prayers and thoughts go out to all the families involved.

I do think, though that this is further evidence of America's continued commitment to always find its American hostages no matter where they are and make every effort to get those hostages returned to the United States.

This mission, in which there will be more detail forthcoming, was extremely well executed. It was a very dangerous and complicated mission. But like always in these efforts, there is risk.

And again, I wanted to begin my comments today by noting the murder of Luke Somers. And again to his family and the families involved, our thoughts and our prayers go out to all of them.

I want to go back to the partnership, the friendship, the relationship between Afghanistan and the United States. And I noted in my opening comment the unity government that President Ghani and CEO Dr. Abdullah are leading, and their commitment to that unity government for the people of Afghanistan. And it's an effort, a unity government that the United States strongly supports.

And I want to also note, Mr. President, and commend both you and Dr. Abdullah for putting the interests of your country first, as the people of Afghanistan have hoped. Challenge is ahead, as you have noted, we all recognize that.

But what happened this year a few months ago, the historic, peaceful transfer of power, was quite significant. And that deserves not only recognition, but also acknowledgement for the people of Afghanistan who refused to be intimidated and turned out and took part, active participation in an electoral process that produced a new government.

I also want to thank the United States efforts and all here who helped in that process over the last few months. And I particularly want to welcome our new American ambassador to Afghanistan. He's not exactly new. But he is the new U.S. ambassador, Ambassador McKinley, who I think just came in this morning.

And also acknowledge once again Gen. Campbell and his team, and of course our ISAF partners who have been so critical, who will remain critical to the future of Afghanistan.

And I want to note and thank the outgoing retiring U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, Ambassador Cunningham, who has played a very, very important role in this process over the last three years. For his service to his country and in particular his service to strengthening this special partnership between our two countries, we thank Ambassador Cunningham and his family, and wish them well.

And I want to thank all of our men and women in uniform, and those who are here in civilian capacities for what they continue to do. And I want to note especially during this time of holidays approaching, their sacrifices are particularly important because they will be away from their families. And to their families and to all of them, please know that President Obama and all of America appreciate your sacrifice and your service.

Reflecting a bit on what President Ghani noted in my statement about our friendship as well, I would note that I first visited this country as my first country that I visited after I was sworn in as secretary of defense.

This is my fourth trip to Afghanistan as secretary of defense. But even before that I traveled to Afghanistan many times as a United States senator. In fact, my first trip was in January of 2002.

So I had seen firsthand over many years of visits to this country enormous progress that this country has made in its development, in its democracy, in its possibilities and hope for all its people. And that, I think is further testimony to the strong partnership of our two countries.

As the president said, this afternoon I had the opportunity to spend some time with the president and chief executive officer. And as President Ghani noted, I had the opportunity to discuss that progress, as well as the transition to a new chapter in America's partnership with Afghanistan.

And I think again when we go back to last summer and the electoral process, it's important to review that. Because since the summer of last year Afghan Forces, Afghan Forces have been in the lead in defending their citizens and their country.

And as we saw during Afghanistan's elections this summer, Afghan Forces have made tremendous strides in protecting the interests and the citizens of this country. Still more to do. Still challenges ahead.

But at the end of this month ISAF's combat mission will come to an end, as everybody knows. NATO coalition forces will transition to the new resolute support mission: training, advising and assisting Afghan Forces as they assume full responsibility for their own nation's security.

The coalition's new mission has the support of the Afghan people, which will be critical for its success. Last month, thanks to the leadership of President Ghani and Dr. Abdullah, the Afghan parliament overwhelmingly approved the U.S.-Afghanistan Bilateral Security Agreement, and the NATO Status of Forces Agreement.

However, because of prior delays in signing these agreements, the force generation effort for resolute support is several months behind. It's behind where we hoped it would be at this time.

As a result, President Obama has provided U.S. military commanders the flexibility, the flexibility to manage any temporary force shortfalls that we might experience for a few months as we allow for coalition troops to arrive in theater.

This will mean the delayed withdrawal of up to 1,000 U.S. troops so that up to 10,800 troops, rather than 9,800, could remain in Afghanistan through the end of this year, and for the first few months next year. But the president's authorization will not change. It will not change our troops' missions or the long-term timeline for our withdrawal.

As planned, resolute support will focus here in Kabul in Bagram with a limited regional presence. As part of this mission the United States is prepared to provide limited combat enabler support to Afghan Forces. And American personnel will always have the right and the capacity to defend themselves against attacks.

We will maintain a limited counterterrorism against Al-Qaeda and its remnants because as we drawdown the combat mission, we have not forgotten, not forgotten what brought America to Afghanistan over a decade ago. We're committed to preventing Al-Qaeda from using Afghanistan as a safe haven to threaten the United States, our allies and partners, and the Afghan people.

And we will take appropriate measures against Taliban members who directly threaten U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan, or provide direct support to Al-Qaeda.

This afternoon President Ghani, Dr. Abdullah and I also discussed the important commitments made by coalition nations at this week's conferences in Brussels and London. Between 2012 and 2015 the United States will have provided more than $8 billion in civilian assistance, and our commitment will be enduring. The recent wave of Taliban attacks has made clear that the international community must not waiver in its support for a stable, secure and prosperous Afghanistan.

I want to again thank my friend President Ghani, my friend Chief Executive Abdullah for their leadership and their commitment to this partnership. And I want to recognize the tremendous service and sacrifices of not only all our U.S. troops, but coalition troops and our partners in the Afghan National Security Forces. Their commitment has forged a defining moment of opportunity for Afghanistan's future and for the people of Afghanistan.

Thank you very much.

Q: Thank you, Mr. President, because of the cameras. This is Mustafa from Turkish News (inaudible). (Inaudible) Secretary Chuck Hagel.

Mr. Secretary, 2012 or 2013 President Obama was planning to pull out combat troops in Afghanistan and combat mission will end in Afghanistan. But now we are saying that the beginning of the next year the Afghan -- U.S. forces will continue to combat mission in Afghanistan. What is the reasons of the continuing combat operation?

Mr. President...

PRES. GHANI: I think you misunderstood entirely what the secretary and I said, Mr. Mustafa. There is no combat mission. You've just misunderstood.

SEC. HAGEL: Let me respond. And I know you have a question for the president. But as the president has just noted, what I said in my statement that President Obama has not changed the mission of U.S. forces. Our combat role will end the end of this year.

The additional margin of up to 1,000 troops, U.S. troops remaining in Afghanistan for the next -- possibly for the next few months will be as a necessary result of getting our ISAF, now Resolute Support mission, partners, trainers and their contributions to the future mission here in place.

So we've essentially -- President Obama has just bought some time for the process to catch up. But the mission does not change. Our combat role is over.

Q (through translator): One question, please. First of all, Mr. Secretary, let me pay our respects for the loss of life of your citizen Mr. Somers in Yemen. Let me also take this opportunity to thank the families of all servicemen and women, those who paid the ultimate sacrifice by losing their lives.

Over 3,400 NATO personnel during the last 10 years as NATO paid the ultimate price. Over 30,000 were wounded. Hundreds of thousands of veterans have shared our lives, and I know that their lives are marked by our deserts, valleys and mountains. We pray for all the fallen, and thank you for noticing the sacrifices of the Afghans.

We have come a very long way together. And we want to make sure that at this season the families of American servicemen and women understand that their sons and daughters are doing something to protect their homeland with stability, as well as help us.

We do understand their sacrifices and we hope that Christmas will be peaceful. And thank you again for coming.

PRES. GHANI: (Speaking in foreign language).

Q: (Speaking in foreign language). I want to ask just one question for Mr. Hagel...

PRES. GHANI: No. Just one question. One question you can (inaudible) polite. So, please pass on to someone else.

I'm sorry. We have to have equality here. I've not seen the hand. Yes. Two questions on this side and then I'll answer your question.

Q: Mr. Secretary, do you feel responsible for the outcome of the Yemen raid? Do you believe Mr. Somers would have been killed by his captors if the U.S. had not acted?

And Mr. President, what additional U.S. assistance do your forces need? Are your forces underequipped for the year to come?

PRES. GHANI: One last question and then we'll answer. So, please?

Q: Missy Ryan from the Washington Post. Mr. Secretary, Secretary Hagel, I'd like to ask about the decision which you just announced to leave up to 1,000 troops temporarily -- extra troops temporarily into next year.

Do you believe that that decision along with the recent decision to expand some of the air support and enabling authorities for the United States post 2014 undermines the message of ending the war in Afghanistan for the United States? And do you have firm numerical commitments from NATO countries to provide troops to the resolute support mission by a certain date next spring so that then you can go down to the 9,800? Thank you.

PRES. GHANI: Mr. Secretary, you first.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you. Well, let me take your question first on the decision that the president made to keep an additional 1,000 troops here to help fill the resolute support mission gap until they catch up, based on what I've said in my statement. Because the election process took longer and that set everybody back.

That does not undermine. That doesn't change the president's policy, his commitment on numbers. What I've just explained is the reason that he made that decision.

That was a recommendation that Gen. Campbell made to Chairman Dempsey and me. We recommended that decision to the president. The National Security Council was unanimous in their recommendation to the president. It does not undermine anything, doesn't change any part of what the president's strategy is.

You had a second part...

Q: (off mic).

SEC. HAGEL: We are in the process of finalizing those now. As you know, that was part of what we were doing. Secretary Kerry, Gen. Campbell, others at the two recent meetings in the NATO ministerial in Brussels. And then of course it was part of the London conversation as well.

We still have, just as we had planned, the four framework countries that are committed. And we will have the rest of the last pieces in place here over the next few weeks. Gen. Breedlove is working with Gen. Campbell on that. So I'm confident that we'll be able to make those kinds of commitments and those commitments will be in place.

As to your question about the rescue effort for Mr. Somers, I think anyone with any responsibility for any missions always has responsibility for actions. That's number one.

Number two, a rescue mission for a hostage is a very complicated matter. It consists of intelligence that we must have tremendous confirmation or the best we can get on, even before an operation is considered.

Intelligence is aware of where that hostage is, who is holding that hostage, where, all the dimensions of security around that hostage. The next piece of that is the operational plan itself, which is very complicated. Many parts, moving parts, all at one time.

Another important factor is was the hostage's life at risk? Would we be taking unnecessary risk to get a hostage out? Those are but just three components that go into a series of dimensions of consideration before any serious consideration of a rescue attempt is ever made.

So I say that because again, our hearts are full of sorrow as I said, that Luke Somers was murdered. He was taken hostage. His life was clearly in danger. And we all, including the president on down, we made the recommendations to the president, of course, have to take responsibilities for any action or inaction, or inaction that we didn't take.

So I would let that answer it.

Q: (off mic)

PRES. GHANI: Well please, no dialogue.

SEC. HAGEL: I will...

PRES. GHANI: Please observe the same rules as that one journalist.

SEC. HAGEL: I like his style here.

But he's the president so.

There will be more details coming out on this specific mission. But at this point I don't have any further details to share.

PRES. GHANI: (Speaking in foreign language).

Who else?

Q: (Speaking in foreign language)?

PRES. GHANI: (Speaking in foreign language).

Let me welcome your question. First of all the key issue is the use of existing capability. There is no army on Earth, there is no security force, there is no civilian that will not ask for more.

But the job of leadership is to first ask of itself and of the team. Are the existing resources being used most efficiently, most accountably, most transparently?

So our first attempt is focus on reform of our security institutions where we'll be able to account for every penny of expenditure, every vehicle that is used, every piece of weaponry. Our focus now is not on fighting individual battles. It is on systems, on management and leadership, on the capabilities.

In the last two months we've taken the rare step that was not taken, different circumstances, of retiring 15 senior generals in Afghanistan's army. The criteria was age and physical ability to perform tasks. This has opened up a long room for change of 70 senior positions.

All of these are being handled through a very careful process. I promise that as commander-in-chief I'll be personally interviewing every person who's promoted to brigadier or is assigned to the rank of brigadier and above. And I've been doing this.

So I think our first job is to make better use of existing resources. In this regard I want to express my most sincere appreciation to Gen. Campbell and his team. We couldn't ask for better partners in this interval. And Secretary Hagel and the entire U.S. team for focusing on the bigger picture.

The bigger picture is that we need to understand that we need to bring peace, stability and prosperity to this country. Every problem is not a nail to be hit with a hammer of force.

We need governance reform. We need focus on the economy, and especially rule of law, the glue that binds to make our gains enduring. It's the wider strategy within we're putting the resource.

Second, there's a plan. Every plan under the context of Chicago. And according to BSA we have the agreement that this plan will be visited annual in terms of better efficiencies regarding use of resources. And we're focusing on that.

Having said that, of course we do have shortages in certain particular areas. Those are part of our bilateral and multilateral discussions. And we very much hope that our forces will have the full capabilities.

But let me conclude by thanking our forces most sincerely. Every single member of Afghanistan army and police is a volunteer, man or woman. Nobody's compelling them to serve in the Afghan Armed Forces. Their patriotism, their willingness to sacrifice, their commitment to this country is what keeps us going.

We face threats that you're aware of. We're facing changing environments of threats. But one thing needs to be clearly understood, our gains are irreversible and we are determined to make sure that our people live in safety and security.

What we strive for is normalcy, to take a walk, a grandfather take a walk with a granddaughter and be safe to return. A young student going to school and making sure, being confident that she's not blown up. Children who play volleyball and can enjoy the game and not be received at mangled bodies.

So while we're absolutely keen on peace and we know that this conflict must end politically, it also needs to be understood that our spirit will not be weakened by cowardly violence against our civilian, particularly our children, women, religious colors, places of worship.

And it's that determination that will ultimately make the difference. And everybody will realize that Afghanistan is here to stay.

A peaceful Afghanistan is not a threat to anyone. A stable Afghanistan is key to regional prosperity. We're very keen on the regional dialogue that we've started, and we very much hope for peace and liberty. Thank you very much and goodbye.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you. Thank you.