Monday, November 17, 2014

TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love,

THE RAINBOW THEATER COMPANY & THE EDGEMAR CENTER FOR THE ARTS PRESENT

 

TANNA FREDERICK and MIKE FALKOW

IN

                                                                                                 

A true story of hate and love

A NEW PLAY BY HENRY JAGLOM

DIRECTED BY GARY IMHOFF

WITH JEFF ELAM, CATHY ARDEN, STEPHEN HOWARD AND KELLY DeSARLA

 

WORLD PREMIERE NOVEMBER 21, 2014

 

It's been said that the other side of love is hate. But is it possible that the other side of hate is love?

 

 

TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love, a new play by Henry Jaglom, reveals humanity in the most unlikely of places – prejudice. This original new play, which will have its World Premiere November 21st at the Edgemar Center for the Arts, is based upon true events that occurred in the life of Henry Jaglom’sfather as he crossed Poland on a train in 1928. Anti-Semitism was, at that time, rife in much of Europe, especially in Poland. In TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love, a successful Russian businessman meets a captivating young nurse in the Polish army on a train-trip to Warsaw, and he is faced with a life-changing dilemma when he discovers that the nurse he is drawn to – and who is enchanted by him -- is fiercely anti-Semitic. Will he reveal to her he is Jewish? Will he move toward love, or will he move toward revenge? The actual train-ride across Poland – and the weekend stop-over in the resort town ofZakopané that followed - haunted Henry Jaglom’sfather for a lifetime. 

 

TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love explores the human condition in its darkest and most exquisite moments.  It is a compelling love story that lays bare how compassion and intolerance can, even in the most unusual of circumstances, be one. 

 

Tanna Frederick stars as the nurse and her co-star as the Russian businessman is Mike Falkow. The supporting cast features Jeff Elam, Cathy Arden, Stephen Howard and Kelly DeSarla, all of whom have performed at The Edgemar before. Ms. Frederick most recently had a highly acclaimed one-year run at The Edgemar starring in the hit production ofN.Richard Nash's The Rainmaker. Prior to that she also was praised for starring in very long runs ofSylvia (as the title dog in A.R. Guerney's classic play) and in Mr Jaglom's Just 45 Minutes From Broadwayand Always-But Not Forever among others.

 

TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love is produced by Alexandra Guarnieri and directed by Gary Imhoff, who previously directed Mr. Jaglom’sAlways But Not ForeverJust 45 Minutes From Broadway, and A.R. Gurney’s Sylvia at the EdgemarCenter for the Arts.

 

Tickets cost $34.99 for general admission. TRAIN TO ZAKOPANÉ: A true story of hate and love will run Thursday through Saturday at 7:30 PM and Sundays at 5:00 pm.

Media Availability with Secretary Hagel Conducted at Fort Irwin, California


REAR ADMIRAL JOHN KIRBY: Okay, folks, I'm Admiral John Kirby, the Pentagon press secretary.

The secretary is going to come on up here. He's got no opening statements. This obviously will be on the record. Only going to be able to take a few questions.

Bob, we're going to start with you, and then I'll call on a couple of -- some of the local reporters here as well.

And then I think -- where's John?

John, you had one, too.

Okay, is everybody ready?

Mr. Secretary?

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL: General Abrams is in the tank there. I hope that we're not in the way.

(UNKNOWN): He couldn't help himself.

SEC. HAGEL: He couldn't help himself. I'm not sure we shouldn't be off to the side, but he is a general.

So yes. All right, Bob?

Q: Mr. Secretary a question for you about the (inaudible) strategy that (inaudible) today. You said it's working and you said it's (inaudible). (inaudible) it could be accelerated (inaudible). General Dempsey had talked this weekend about (inaudible).

SEC. HAGEL: Yes, we -- at the recommendation of General Austin, have agreed with General Austin's recommendations to take some of the special operations forces that he has in Iraq and give them some early missions working with the Iraqi security forces in Anbar province just to kind of continue to mission accelerate the mission of preparing for training and equipping, and the things that we need to do to start setting that up.

Because it is a process, it has to be done right; we've got to get the right trainers in there, coalition partners. So yes, we are doing what we can with the resources we have to give some acceleration to that.

Q: Has this just begun in the last couple of days or a week?

SEC. HAGEL: Last couple of days that he has moved some of this advisers into Anbar province to work with the Iraqi security forces.

Q: (off mic) You talked a little bit about (inaudible). You know that (inaudible) on the (inaudible). (inaudible). Can you talk a little bit about how the environment here is critical to the U.S. military?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, this is really a critically important base for our training. Yes, partly because of the environment that it represents, and it does give our trainers a very realistic geography to work with, and we've invested a lot of effort here and resources, and it has really been a very smart investment, because it's paid off in the training and the capabilities that our men and women get through this training here. So it's a unique location. It's an important location.

Q: (off mic)

SEC. HAGEL: Well, first, I think everybody knew from the beginning, because this is a rotational overall mission, that we would be requiring National Guard assistance and participation. So I went ahead and authorized the beginning of that last week. Nothing is moving; it takes time to -- but you've got to notify our Guardsmen and their families and their employers.

But anticipating any further call-ups, not in our planned -- at this point.

Q: (off mic)

SEC. HAGEL: Well, it depends on how successful we all are in stopping the spread of Ebola. Working, as you know, with the USAID and CDC and the Liberian government, we're hopeful that it won't be a long mission at all.

But we're uncertain until we know that we have been able to stop it. There are positive signs, but we're planning for a six-month mission, but we'll see. It just depends on how successful we all are in stopping the spread of Ebola.

REAR ADM. KIRBY: We've got one more question.

Sir, we'll go to you.

Q: You mentioned in budget constraints that there were facilities that (inaudible). Are any of those in California? And if so, (inaudible)?

SEC. HAGEL: (Laughter.) I'm not going to get into which ones.

Q: (off mic)

SEC. HAGEL: We have a pretty clear inventory of where we have excess capacity. We've shared at least our thinking, some of our thinking, with the Congress on this, but that's the whole point behind a BRAC, a base closing commission that allows an independent look at what facilities are still being used, which facilities are important to the future of our country, our security, and which are not.

And it was setup, you'll recall, many years ago, to give not only an honest assessment of that, but also take it out of politics.

And so, what we're asking for, again, is for the Congress to authorize another base relocation closing commission to go in and take a hard look, an insightful, honest look, and evaluate where that excess capacity is. And I would hope the Congress will allow us to do that, and I would hope that they would support another round of BRAC.

REAR ADM. KIRBY: Thanks, everybody. Appreciate it.

SEC. HAGEL: Thank you.

Statement by Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel on the Murder of Abdul-Rahman AKA Peter Kassig



On behalf of all the men and women of the Department of Defense, I extend my deepest condolences to the family of Abdul-Rahman Kassig, also known to us as Peter, who time and again volunteered his service during times of war -- first as an Army Ranger in Iraq, and later as a devoted humanitarian, providing aid to victims of the conflict in Syria. Like his fellow veterans of the 9/11 generation, his strong desire to continue making a difference in the world after serving in uniform -- to continue leading a life of purpose -- is an inspiration to us all. His brutal murder is one more reminder of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant's (ISIL) ruthless barbarity; there is no starker contrast between the inhumanity of ISIL and the bright and generous spirit of the young man they murdered. As we join his loved ones in mourning his loss, we also celebrate his service, and we celebrate his commitment -- a lifetime commitment to, as he said, "stand beside those who might need a helping hand."
 

Remarks by Secretary Hagel During a Troop Event at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, California



MAJOR GENERAL TED MARTIN: Okay. Ladies and gentlemen, my name is Major General Ted Martin. I'm the commanding general of the National Training Center. I've got the best job on the planet. I would like to tell you that we've got a great day here.

We're going to be welcoming our secretary of defense. (Inaudible) telling you somebody is more than the secretary of defense, he's a fellow soldier, as General Odierno says, he's a soldier for life, because once you're soldier, you're always a soldier.

He's a combat infantryman. He earned a Blue Cord, like many in the service standing here today. Like us he has worn boots on the battlefield, so he knows what it means to sacrifice for his country, but more importantly, he knows of the sacrifices that our families are making, and we're out here training, and we're deployed fighting for our country.

Ladies and gentlemen, it's my honor to introduce the 24th secretary of defense, Secretary Chuck Hagel. (Applause.)

SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL: Thank you. Thank you. General, thank you. Thank you. General, thank you. Good afternoon.

First, you know, sit down, kneel down, relax, I was just a sergeant so I didn't give any orders. Still don't. I want to thank you for what you're doing. I want to thank your families for their sacrifices and what they're doing to support you.

You're all making a better world for all of us. You are engaged in as important a mission as there is. And that's the security of this country. So to all of you and your families, and to your colleagues, thank you.

Also, I very much appreciate the opportunity to come out here today and witness an exercise that some of you have participated in, if not all of you, this morning to see first hand the kind of full spectrum training that you're getting.

It is critically important that the kind of training you're getting here continue to be refined because, as you all know so very well, it is training that prepares you, that keeps you ready. It is training that keeps you on the cutting edge of what's coming next.

We can't predict anything in the world and in life, but we do know that the unpredictable is the predictable. It is the one thing that we know is coming. And the more we can stay ahead of the threats and the challenges, not wait for those to come to us, but for us to be prepared and we go to them, that's the key.

And what you're doing here represents that as much as any element of our entire defense enterprise training that we have. And I want you to know that I understand that. All of my leaders, your leaders, understand that, will continue to support that in every way.

I was in North Dakota on Friday where we talked a little bit about what we're doing to renew and upgrade and modernize our nuclear enterprise. But I reminded all of our missileers and all those who are engaged in that important work that, yes, the nuclear deterrent is essential, it's critical to our defense, to our security, but so is our conventional forces.

And so are those forces so critical, what you're doing, Special Operations in our Air Force and our Army, our Navy, that all coming together is what's most important and essential, and what represents our future.

The kind of full spectrum training that you're getting here when you're not just being soldiers, you're being soldiers first, but you've got to know a little something more about the environment that you're going into, some of the history, some of the culture, some of the human dimensions that always play out in any contest, and in any conflict.

After all, it is about people, where they come from, what they think, why they do things the way they do, how are they recruited in so much of this fanaticism, this dangerous, dangerous radicalism, terrorism.

You have to be mayors of small towns. You have to be sewer commissioners. You have to be architects. And you have to be soldiers. You're soldiers first, but you've got to have all those other pieces as well.

And as I watched this training this morning, it reminded me again of the coordination that (inaudible), all the things that you all did together, it was impressive.

And I want, again, you to know that we're going to continue within our defense establishment to emphasize that kind of training, give your commanders, give all of you more and more latitude and flexibility to decide what you think is most important as how we prepare you as we prepare our next generation of soldiers to deal with not only the challenges we have right now in front of us, but what may yet come.

The asymmetrical threats that we're also dealing with, and the cyber piece that is included in your exercises, in your training is a good example of that kind of emerging and sophisticated and new threat.

I want to particularly note that here today are all the various components of this effort, the trainees, the established opposition, the 11th Cav, I have a personal recollection about the 11th Cav when my brother and I served together in Vietnam in 1968, his first five weeks in Vietnam, he served with the 11th Cav up on the DMZ of Vietnam, working with then Colonel George S. Patton Jr.

And then he was transferred down to serve with me in the 9th Division in the Mekong Delta.

I also know something about the 4th Infantry Division, not only because the chief of staff of the Army once commanded the 4th ID, but I went to Vietnam in December of 1967 with orders to go to the 4th ID.

So I almost was a member of your unit. But there were other plans. So I tell you those stories because I don't know of an American today that is not connected in some way with our armed forces, whether it was a family member, what you represent.

So many of you come from families of service, your mothers, your fathers, your brothers, your sisters, uncles, grandparents served. You serve as role models for our society, for our next generation of young people coming behind you, what you do.

What you do is not just what you do here or on the battlefield or anywhere else you go. But you represent as proud a tradition and as important a job as there is in this country.

Before we run out of some time, and I know we're going to have an opportunity to take pictures, and I want to give each a coin, I want to also thank the community.

Fort Irwin and the people in this area of California who have been so supportive of our troops and their families over a number of years. That just doesn't happen. And I know about that. I come from a state, Nebraska, where the state of Nebraska embraces completely, thoroughly the Strategic Command and all of the Americans who serve there and have served there.

So I know it's a community effort. And I want to thank the community and the communities all around for their continued support and help in so many ways.

Also I'd be glad to take a couple of questions before we take some photos. But I would also note that not only you may have a question to ask, but if you've got a suggestion. I've said here a couple of minutes that it's important that we listen to our commanders and we listen to our leaders as to what they think is important, not just in training, but everything.

What do they think works, what doesn't work, what we should we be doing more of, maybe less of? The only way we really understand that and know that is we have to come out and see it and listen, and reach out.

So if any of you have got any thoughts on anything, not just regarding the training, but how we can do things better in this business, I would welcome those thoughts.

So with that, we'll just open it up and we'll take a few minutes and talk about whatever you want to talk about.

Yes.

Q: Just a question, sir. With things heating up in Iraq and Syria, do you feel in the future we'll probably deploy a full invasion force against ISIS?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, I think the president has been pretty clear on our strategy regarding ISIS. And as you know, General Dempsey is just returning from Iraq where I'll have some time with him tomorrow.

But where we start is the strategy. And the strategy is working. The strategy is to support the Iraqis in their fight against ISIL. We're doing that in many ways.

First, as they have just elected and formed a new government, a new government that must be inclusive, that must be participatory, that must reach out to all of the people in Iraq to gain the people of Iraq's confidence and trust, Sunni, Shia, Kurds. Some of you have served there, many of you have served there.

That's part of it. We're helping with that. We're supporting that. They're a sovereign nation. It is their country. They have to do this themselves.

Second, as you know, we have had -- we have had advisers over in Iraq working with Iraqi security forces as we are working with them to assess what they need to strengthen their forces.

We are working with a number of our coalition partners, and have been using air strikes effectively to help the Iraqi security forces build and strengthen their forces as we give them time, as we give them support, as we help them.

We also know that we're in the process now of opening four training centers in Iraq where we will train and equip, along with coalition partners who have also committed to trainers, help the Iraqi security forces, the Peshmerga forces.

We are expediting requests for munitions, for equipment, for supplies. We have been doing that over the last few months. All of those are different ways how we are continuing to help.

And through an effective coalition, we have over 60 members of that coalition, and they're all participating in some way. Some will be sending trainers to be part of those four training centers.

Others are working with us and actually carrying out air strikes. They're all in some way participating.

But this has to be an Iraqi effort. It is their country. They're a sovereign country. We were invited in. They asked us to come in and help them. And we are doing that. So our anti-ISIL strategy is comprehensive, it's complete.

It includes all the different components of what we're -- of what I just talked about in (inaudible). The president just announced recently recommendations that General Dempsey, General Austin had brought to me, and I recommended to the president, that we increase our troops by about 1,500 to focus on those training and equipping missions, as well as self -- force protection, force protection for our forces, because that is as key and foremost in our priorities, the protection of our own people, as any one priority.

So if that gives you some dimension of what we're doing now, we're doing a lot. And we're doing the things that we need to do to support that new inclusive government. And there are a lot of good things happening.

Just one additional example, you know they -- the Iraqi government has not had an Iraqi minister of defense for over four years. The new government under Prime Minister Abadi recently selected a new minister of defense, a Sunni minister of defense who has been working in Anbar province and reaching out to the Sunni tribes.

As we help the Iraqi security forces build in and integrate the Sunni tribe into that security force, in fact, last weekend there was a ceremony that included about 2,000 Sunni tribesmen, as they are starting to get into a swearing in -- eventual swearing in ceremony and start moving in to training in the Iraqi security forces.

So there is a lot going on. But we've also said -- General Dempsey said this again when he was there that this is a difficult mission. It will be a long mission. This isn't going to be over quickly.

And we have to be prepared for that. But we are going to do it in a way that what we do to help the Iraqis is sustainable, that it will last, that it will be there, and it's for them and for their country.

Do you have one question over here? It was somebody over here?

Anybody else? I'm sorry. Yes.

Q: Sir, could you talk to us about what the U.S. position is in Nigeria? I mean, do we have boots on the ground in Nigeria fighting the hostiles there, the radical...

(CROSSTALK)

SEC. HAGEL: Well, we're helping the Nigerian government and supporting the government in their efforts. And that's another area that obviously (inaudible) organized governments and countries and societies of Boko Haram and that terrorist group, what it's doing to tear apart the country of Nigeria, and its brutality.

So we, through AFRICOM, help and assist in different supporting roles. And that's one area that we're helping in. We don't have boots on the ground there.

Yes.

Q: Sir.

SEC. HAGEL: Oh, I'm sorry, (inaudible).

Q: Sir, are there any plans on the horizon to get us more funding for better training, better equipment, or just better -- or back to an area where it was during the Iraq War, Afghanistan War?

SEC. HAGEL: Well, we are constantly upgrading equipment and materiel. And this is, again, I go back to a point I made earlier about why it's important to come out and listen to the commanders and see what you all need and what you need more of.

At the same time, we also know about budget constraints that we're dealing with right now. The Defense Department has taken deep, steep, abrupt cuts in its budget over the last few years.

Those budget constraints are going to continue. Sequestration has done tremendous damage to our resource base.

We will, once again, be presenting to Congress a budget that we hope will be a budget that they can agree to and they will eliminate sequestration to free us up in not only our ability and flexibility to make the decisions we need to make inside the department on reforming programs, platforms, processes, reforming all the various aspects of our enterprise.

As we see platforms -- older platforms age and become less effective, less efficient, we need to move those through the system, as we have done in the history of all of our platforms, because we have coming in behind them on-line more efficient, more effective platforms.

We need the flexibility from Congress to be able to do that, not lock us in to preserving things that we don't need.

We have a tremendous excess in base facilities, so many bases we don't need, facilities we don't need, that we're paying billions of dollars in overhead a year that we don't need. That's part of it.

The resource base itself, the funding has to get fixed. It's something we're working on. It does affect readiness. It does affect maintenance. It does affect equipment. It does affect the things that you're talking about.

But we are committed not to ever, ever put any of you or any of our troops in a situation where you do not have the edge as you have had in every way, technologically, in preparation, in training, in readiness, no fair fights, we don't like fair fights.

And that's something that we will continue to fight for. And it's critically important for our country, for the future of this force.

Somebody -- yes.

Q: (off mic). So as the secretary of defense, we understand it's a very important job and you've done great, a lot of service for us, and an intricate part of our military community.

But it has been a long time since we had a combat veteran in the White House. When can we expect you to run for the presidency, sir? (Laughter.)

SEC. HAGEL: I've got my hands full. I have my hands full, not just because I have a Band-Aid on my face, it's a tough job. But I appreciate your comments. But I'll tell you, I don't, first of all, minimize combat experience. I don't think anybody would, does.

But I don't think you need to be a combat veteran to be a good leader and understand the necessities and leadership and what it takes to keep this country safe.

I think President Obama has done an excellent job of working with us, listening to us. General Dempsey and I meet with him once a week, privately. And he listens to what we have to say. He supports us. He has listened to our recommendations, has supported those recommendations.

There will be a new president in two years, but for right now, President Obama is the president. And I think his commitment to you, to the security of this country is strong.

And I also think it's important to have a president of the United States, at this time in the world with such volatility and so much coming at us all at once -- probably unprecedented.

I don't know the time when so much is happening all at once, coming at us. And it all rolls back down hill on us: Ebola, what's happening in Eastern Europe, ISIL, across the board.

To have a president who is thoughtful, who is wise, who understands that application of force sometimes is required, but never without a strategy behind it, never without the other dimensions of wise policy.

And I think that in particular is something that America would always want in their presidents, whether they have military experience or not. And I think this president has shown that he has that.

Thank you all very much. And I think we're going to -- are there any other questions? Are we okay time-wise or John? okay.

Again, I am so appreciative of the opportunity to be here with you today, and to come out and thank you personally and to see what you're doing, what you mean to all of us, and to our country, and also to have an opportunity for you to make certain that you tell your families how much we appreciate them.

It's tough on families. So we all know that. And we're going to continue to do everything we can to support the families because they're critical to supporting you and supporting us.

So thank you. (Applause.)

Thank you. Thank you.

Sunday, November 16, 2014

TROOP TALK



11/16/2014 12:44 PM CST

U.S. Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, listens to a question from a service member during a town hall meeting in Baghdad, Nov. 15, 2014. Dempsey visited deployed U.S. service members, U.S. civilians and Iraqi leaders.

Greenert Discusses Innovation at Defense Forum


By Lisa Ferdinando
Army News Service

SIMI VALLEY, Calif., Nov. 16, 2014 - Connecting with researchers and getting personnel involved in projects are ways to encourage innovation, the Navy's top officer said at the Reagan National Defense Forum here yesterday.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert speaks at the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif. The Reagan National Defense Forum brings together leaders and key stakeholders in the defense community -- including members of Congress, civilian officials and military leaders from the Defense Department and industry -- to address the health of U.S. national defense and stimulate discussions that promote policies that strengthen the U.S. military in the future. DoD photo by Kevin O'Brien
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert attended a panel discussion about rethinking the industrial base and how the Pentagon can capitalize on and incentivize innovation.

Maintaining good communications with defense researchers is a key factor for innovation, said Greenert, noting it's not helpful to have a "bunch of lab coats out there doing various things and see what falls out."

Relationships With Industry

Having good relationships with businesses also is important, he said, as well as providing them early input when you have an idea.

"You've got to look internationally with business. You've got to talk to the industry partners," the admiral said. "In the world I live in, we have sea power because we have an industrial base that is awesome and it brings us good things."

Greenert recommended looking inward and utilizing what equipment and personnel you have.

Promote Innovative Thinking

The admiral reported positive results in getting junior officers and enlisted personnel involved in innovative thinking, such as in finding a way to determine cyber vulnerabilities for ships.

"It's an astounding thing that we're using for our standard," he said.

Looking at what you have and seeing what you can do with it can produce good results, Greenert said.

When the Navy needed a way to transport items off a ship, it employed innovative thinking and saved billions of taxpayer dollars, he said.

Saving Taxpayer Dollars

"We sat down and said, 'We need more expeditionary capability but we don't want to spend billions of dollars on a gray hull [ship] when really I need just a means to move things from ship-to-shore," Greenert said.

Rather than paying $4.5 billion for a brand-new vessel, the Navy instead went to a shipbuilder and obtained a modified Alaskan tanker for $500 million.

It's important to "retire the risk as much as feasible" or even put a project aside, Greenert said, instead of spending "millions and maybe billions on a program that's just never going to come to fruition."

Medal of Honor Recipient Says He's 'No Hero'


By Lisa Ferdinando
Army News Service

SIMI VALLEY, Calif., Nov. 16, 2014 - Former Army Staff Sgt. Salvatore A. Giunta, who in 2010 became the first living Medal of Honor recipient since the Vietnam War, says he is not a hero.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Medal of Honor recipient former Army Staff Sgt. Salvatore A. Giunta, center, takes part in a panel discussion at the Reagan National Defense Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014. DoD photo by Kevin O'Brien
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

"It makes me feel awkward. I struggled with it for a long time," Giunta said about being called a hero.

Giunta, who received the Medal of Honor for his heroic actions in Afghanistan, participated in a panel discussion at the Reagan National Defense Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library here yesterday.

"It's almost been four years since I've been out of the military and the fact that someone would call me personally a hero seems inappropriate," he said.

Discussion on Heroism, Valor

All the soldiers worked together and fought together, Giunta said during the panel discussion about military heroism and valor.

"Nothing I ever did, did I do alone. I followed what someone told me to do and someone followed me," he said.

"I've served with heroes. We can be heroes. I am no hero," he said.

Giunta's received the Medal of Honor for his actions during a fierce battle following an enemy ambush in Afghanistan's Korengal Valley in October 2007. Two U.S. soldiers, Sgt. Joshua Brennan and Spc. Hugo Mendoza, were killed in the attack.

"Oct. 25, 2007, was my date of action that I would receive this award. My life didn't change other than I lost two good friends," Giunta said.

He said his life did "change drastically" in 2010, when the recognition of what he did became public.

Medal of Honor is 'Awesome Responsibility'

He said it is not a burden to have the Medal of Honor but rather an "awesome responsibility."

Giunta, then a specialist with Company B, 2nd Battalion (Airborne), 503rd Infantry Regiment, exposed himself to heavy enemy fire to aid a fellow soldier he believed was injured during the ambush.

He engaged the enemy and advanced up a hill alone and under fire. Giunta saw two insurgents carrying away a gravely injured Brennan. Giunta killed one of the insurgents and prevented the enemy from taking Brennan.

"When I was told I was going to receive the Medal of Honor it hurt my feelings. I was so angry. I was so upset," he said.

"The fact that I did this with everyone and you want to put an award around my neck and slap me on the back and tell me 'congratulations' when I didn't do it alone," Giunta explained.

"Two of my buddies gave every single-one of their tomorrows so I could have a today, and you're going to put a medal around my neck? I struggled with that," he said.

Term 'Hero' Not Taken Lightly

The Army wants to know what makes a hero, according to Army Gen. David G. Perkins, the commanding general of U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command.

"This term 'hero' we don't take lightly," Perkins said during the panel discussion. "We actually think about it quite a bit and try to figure out what is it that makes one."

A hero is someone, in the face of adversity or danger and from a position of weakness, displays a will for self-sacrifice for the betterment of others, he said.

Perkins said Giunta did all of that during the battle.

"Valor is really the strength of mind and will to face danger and stand firm in the face of it," he said. "You have to possess valor to act in a heroic manner."

Giunta is an example of that, Perkins said.

"The medal that Sergeant Giunta wears is not the 'Medal of Heroism,' it's called the Medal of Honor," Perkins said.

Saluting Valor

It is a great honor to be an officer who salutes a Medal of Honor recipient, retired Air Force Gen. Paul Hester said.

"A sergeant wearing the Medal of Honor no longer offers his salute to an officer; the officer offers his salute to the Medal of Honor recipient," Hester said.

"A prouder moment for me as a one-star was when I stood at the bottom of the ramp of an airplane and [Army] Master Sgt. Roy Benavidez came to my base, Medal of Honor recipient from Vietnam, for me to stand there and offer him the salute as he came down the stairs," he said.

"It is a true honor," Hester said.


DEFENSE FORUM SPEECH


11/16/2014 07:10 AM CST

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel makes remarks during the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014. Hagel is on a five-day trip visiting troops across the United States.

DEFENSE REMARKS


11/15/2014 08:36 PM CST

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel makes remarks during the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014.

Winnefeld Urges 'Reset' in National Security Balance


By Lisa Ferdinando
Army News Service

SIMI VALLEY, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014 - Sharp cuts and continued uncertainty in the U.S. defense budget have upset the strategic balance of the nation's security, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said here today.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Navy Vice Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, makes remarks during the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014. DoD photo by Kevin O'Brien
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

"If we're wise, we'll drive that strategic balance back to a favorable equilibrium before it's too late," Navy Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr. said. "If we're not, then we're going to have to live together with the consequences."

Winnefeld was the keynote speaker at a luncheon at the day-long Reagan National Defense Forum at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library.

"The trajectory of the security environment and the ongoing turbulence in defense funding have upset the strategic balance among the ends, ways, and means of our nation's security and we need to reset it," he said.

Winnefeld spoke in place of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, who is visiting with U.S. troops in Iraq today.

Russia, China Among International Challenges

As the United States was engaged in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan over the past decade, the "rest of the world did not stand idly by," Winnefeld said.

"Major states like Russia and China, convinced that the unipolar moment was fading fast, and capitalizing on our distraction, began asserting themselves," he said.

Russia's recent aggression in Ukraine is an example, but is by far not the only example, the admiral said.

"In protecting our allies against potential mischief from these powers, we've always counted on our overmatch in capability and capacity to offset the challenges of distance and initiative," Winnefeld said.

"That overmatch is now in jeopardy," he said.

Russia and China are investing in new capabilities, such as precision-guided weapons, stealth, unmanned platforms in traditional domains, and new capabilities in the space and cyber domains, Winnefeld said.

They are also modernizing their nuclear forces, the admiral said.

Meanwhile, he said, the United States "contends every day with two insecure, authoritarian regimes in North Korea and Iran, who covet weapons of mass destruction as insurance policies."

Other threats to the balance of national security include "violent extremism and deep instability" in North and East Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia, Winnefeld said.

Other threats with other challenges include transnational criminal organizations, pandemics such as the Ebola crisis, and natural disasters and tensions exacerbated by droughts and food shortages.

"Our world remains a dynamic and very dangerous place," Winnefeld said.

Budget Uncertainty a Major Challenge

The U.S. strategic balance is being impacted by decreased defense spending, the admiral said, and continued budget uncertainty.

"We aren't modernizing as fast as we should in a highly competitive technical landscape; our capability overmatch is slipping," he said.

While the United States is meeting its daily military deployment demands, the fiscal environment has put a "real dent in our ability to surge," the admiral said.

The budget challenges and reductions have "pushed us hard against the bounds of manageable risk," he said.

Meanwhile, the "sequester is a bet that went terribly wrong and its salami-slice method is the most-destructive way possible to reduce a budget," he said.

Winnefeld said the strategic balance "truly becomes untenable under sequester-sized cuts."

DoD Needs to 'Reach Even Harder for Efficiencies'

The Department of Defense, the admiral said, needs to find the next technological offset. He predicts that could be more about payloads than platforms, and involve every warfighting domain, and will likely be a combination of diverse technologies.

"We need to get to the far side of the whole ends, ways, and means discussion if we're going to get ourselves back in balance," the admiral said.

Winnefeld said he would like to restore equilibrium by preserving the ends of the national security interests while maintaining manageable risk.

There are several things, he said, that need to be done.

The admiral said the Department of Defense needs to "reach even harder for efficiencies" and Congress should support it and remove some of the barriers in aiding the department in becoming more efficient.

The department needs to "embrace new operational plans, concepts, and technologies that could change the complexion of our force," he said.

U.S. Aided Afghan, Iraqi People

In response to a question from an audience member, Winnefeld said he believes United States military involvement has aided the people in Iraq or Afghanistan.

"What we did in Iraq was give the Iraqi people the chance to set themselves on a course that would allow them to have a government that would look out for the needs and the rights and the prosperity of all Iraqis," the admiral said.

Now, the United States is helping the Iraqi people battle Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists, the admiral said. ISIL, he added, possessed the potential to threaten the United States.

Winnefeld said he's optimistic about the battle against ISIL, noting Iraqi security forces are ready to fight and the current Iraqi government will work with the United States and has said it has the goal of looking out for the interest of all the Iraqi people.

"We think they've a good shot of recovering from the disruption they've just been through," the admiral said.

The same thing has happened in Afghanistan, he said.

"We have given the Afghan people, through the blood and sacrifice of many American young men and women, an opportunity to have a brighter future," Winnefeld said.

The United States has put Afghanistan on a course where "success is in their hands," the admiral said.

 

Saturday, November 15, 2014

Hagel Announces New Defense Innovation, Reform Efforts


By Cheryl Pellerin
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2014 - In a keynote speech tonight at the 2014 Reagan National Defense Forum, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced a plan to harness the brightest minds and cutting-edge technology to change the way the Department of Defense innovates and operates.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel provides remarks during the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014. DoD photo by U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Cassandra Flowers
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

On the second day of a five-day trip nationwide to see some of the critical training the force receives to maintain readiness, Hagel addressed members of Congress, DoD officials, military leaders, and members of the defense industry during the annual forum held in Simi Valley, California.

Along with the new innovation initiative, the secretary also announced a project to reform the defense enterprise, preparing it to deal with dwindling budgets in an uncertain future.

DoD Experiencing a Time of Transition

"The Department of Defense is undergoing a defining time of transition," Hagel said. "We [face] a reshaping of our enterprise by a fiscal environment plagued by ... budget uncertainty and a large decline in resources, and by an historic realignment of interests and influences around the world."

As these dynamics unfold, he added, the U.S. military is engaged in crises and security challenges around the world - degrading the terrorist organization the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, helping to stop the spread of Ebola virus disease, and reinforcing NATO allies.

"Few would have predicted these missions a year ago," the secretary said, adding that DoD is responsible for addressing a range of contingencies and crises.

New, Old Threats, Challenges

"We face the rise of new technologies, national powers and non-state actors," as well as "sophisticated, deadly and often asymmetric emerging threats ranging from cyberattacks to transnational criminal networks, [and] persistent, volatile threats we have faced for years," Hagel said.

The nation's long-term security, he added, depends on whether the department can address today's crises while preparing for tomorrow's threats.

Hagel described the department's two most-important investments as bolstering the United States' unrivaled capacity for innovation and reforming the defense enterprise to ensure that the military foundation is reliable, agile, accountable and worthy of the men and women who serve.

While the United States and its allies spent more than a decade at war, he said, countries like Russia and China have heavily invested in military modernization programs to blunt the U.S. military's technological edge, fielding advanced aircraft, submarines and longer-range and more accurate missiles, and developing new anti-ship and air-to-air missiles, and counter-space, cyber, electronic warfare, undersea and air-attack capabilities.

New Defense Innovation Initiative

"Today I am announcing a new Defense Innovation Initiative," Hagel told the audience, describing the effort as an ambitious, departmentwide effort to identify and invest in innovative ways to sustain and advance America's military dominance for the 21st century.

"Continued fiscal pressure will likely limit our military's ability to respond to long-term challenges ... so to overcome challenges to our military superiority we must change the way we innovate, operate and do business," the secretary explained.

The innovation initiative, he said, will ensure that U.S. power-projection capabilities continue to sustain a competitive advantage over the coming decades.

Identifying, Developing Cutting-edge Technologies

As part of the initiative, Hagel said, a new Long-Range Research and Development Planning Program will help identify, develop and field breakthroughs from the most cutting-edge technologies and systems, especially in robotics, autonomous systems, miniaturization, big data and advanced manufacturing, including 3-D printing.

"The program will look toward the next decade and beyond," he said, "[but] in the near-term it will invite some of the brightest minds from inside and outside government to ... assess the technologies and systems DoD [should] develop over the next three to five years and beyond."

The innovation initiative will explore and develop new operational concepts, including new approaches to warfighting, and balancing DoD's investments between platforms and payloads, Hagel said.

People Are DoD's Premier Asset

New approaches to war-gaming and professional military education already are in development, the secretary added, "and [the initiative] will focus on the department's most-important asset -- people -- by pursuing time-honored leadership development practices and emerging opportunities to reimagine how we develop managers and leaders."

Deputy Defense Secretary Robert O. Work will guide the innovation initiative's development and lead a new Advanced Capability and Deterrence Panel to drive it forward, Hagel said.

"The panel will integrate DoD's senior leadership across the entire enterprise -- its policy and intelligence communities, the armed services, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and research, development and acquisition authorities," he said.

Hagel said he expects the panel to propose changes to the way DoD diagnoses and plans for challenges to the military's competitive edge, and to face a new challenge head-on -- the fact that many breakthrough technologies are no longer in the domain of DoD development pipelines or traditional defense contractors.

Seeking Private-sector Proposals

"We all know that DoD no longer has exclusive access to the most cutting-edge technology or the ability to spur or control the development of new technologies the way we once did," the defense secretary said. "So we will actively seek proposals from the private sector, including firms and academic institutions outside DoD's traditional orbit."

The Defense Innovation Initiative will shape the department's programs, plans and budgets, Hagel said, adding that as the initiative matures over time he expects its impact on the defense budget to scale up as well.

"As the world in which we operate changes, we must change too," the defense secretary said, adding that he has ordered full reviews of the department's business and management systems.

"The first reviews are underway now, starting with the Office of the Secretary of Defense," Hagel said. "DoD must embrace better business practices that are core to any modern enterprise, private or public."

Upgrade Business, Information Technology Systems

The department will upgrade business and information technology systems and processes, striking the right balance between civil service and contractor support and avoiding duplication of support functions in OSD and the services, he said, adding that after years of postponement and delay the department is making progress in moving toward greater financial accountability.

Hagel said the department has been making hard choices and mustering the flexibility required by new geopolitical and fiscal realities.

"But to succeed," he said, "we need the support and partnership of Congress, especially at a time when demands on our military are surging and our resources are shrinking and our ability to manage our institution is being more and more limited."

The continuation of sequestration could impose nearly $1 trillion in cuts to the defense budget over 10 years, the defense secretary said, in a department that has already begun taking deep cuts over the last few years.

Sequestration 'Would Devastate' Military Readiness

Sequestration, he said, "would devastate our military readiness and threaten our ability to execute our nation's defense strategy. Congress has an opportunity this year to help the Defense Department, and I and all the leaders of DoD look forward to working with Congress on this challenge."

Hagel added, "If we make the right investments in our partnerships around the world in innovation and in our defense enterprise we will continue to keep our nation's military and our nation's global leadership on a strong and sustainable path for the 21st century."


DoD Seeks to Cut Red Tape, Bureaucracy, Officials Say


By Claudette Roulo
DoD News, Defense Media Activity

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2014 - Cutting red tape and eliminating bureaucracy is a priority effort throughout the Defense Department, both the Secretary of the Air Force and DoD's top acquisitions official said today at the Reagan Defense Forum in Simi Valley, California.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Secretary of the Air Force Deborah Lee James addresses the audience at the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014. The Reagan National Defense Forum brings together leaders and key stakeholders in the defense community -- including members of Congress, civilian officials and military leaders from the Defense Department and industry -- to address the health of U.S. national defense and stimulate discussions that promote policies that strengthen the U.S. military in the future. DoD photo by Kevin O'Brien
 
(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said operating efficiently is more important now than ever before.

"We have a combination of world conditions which have our military perhaps the busiest that we have been in recent memory," she said. "Things seem to be popping up all over the world in near-simultaneous fashion. ... and of course there's a certain state of play now that we're dealing with -- both in the executive branch and in Congress -- in terms of coming up with gridlock as opposed to coming up with solutions to move forward."

Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisitions, Logistics and Technology Frank Kendall noted that eliminating government waste requires "constancy of focus, tenacity and the will to do it. And it takes a lot of time."

One of the first things Kendall did when he came back into government four-and-a-half years ago, he said, was to start slimming down the requirements for program milestone reviews.

"It is a constant struggle to proceed in that area and to succeed," the undersecretary said.

The Better Buying Power initiatives, begun in 2010, include a serious effort at eliminating unproductive processes and bureaucracy, he noted. "And we're just going to have to keep at it, because one of the iron rules, unfortunately, about bureaucracies is they tend to grow if left alone," Kendall said.

Acquisitions Review

The undersecretary said he has been working on rewriting DoD Instruction 5000.02, the acquisitions guidance document that outlines all the procedures and requirements for program managers.

The instruction also describes the statutory and regulatory requirements imposed by Congress on defense programs, he said, noting that many of these requirements are overlapping or confusing.

"I was astonished, I guess, and dismayed at the length of that section of the document," Kendall said. "Twenty or 30 pages of tables of requirements, one after the other, after the other."

Working together with Senate Armed Services Committee staff members, the undersecretary's office quickly put together a short list of streamlined requirements for the FY 2015 defense budget, he said.

"And we have a longer list we're working on now we hope to get into the next years' bill," Kendall added. "That table, that section ... we're going to cut it in about half, we think."

Smaller Air Force, Many Missions

The Air Force is conducting its own internal efficiency reviews, James said, noting that they carry a particular urgency for the service.

"Today's Air Force, in terms of numbers of people, is the smallest Air Force that we have ever had," she said. "...At the same time, we also have fewer aircraft than we have had in our history," James added. Those aircraft are aging, she noted.

"I don't want to be a 'Chicken Little,' but the sky is falling," the secretary said. At the same time that the Air Force is shrinking, it's busier than ever and plagued by readiness issues, she explained.

"Half of our combat air forces -- approximately half -- are not, today, at the state of readiness that we want or need them to be in the event of a high-end fight," James said. "A high-end fight means going up against an enemy that has the capability to shoot us down or interfere with us in some way.

"...We don't want to forever be the best 1980's vintage air force that money can buy, we want to be the very best 21st-century air force money can buy," she continued. "So, given the budget environment ... we've had to make some some tough choices ... every single one of which has run into some difficulties in the Congress."

Air Force Efficiency Projects

In response to a challenge by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, the Air Force will reduce its headquarters by 20 percent by Fiscal Year 2015, James said.

Additionally, she said, "I'm conducting now monthly program reviews on the top weapons systems to try to bring my business experience to bear to ensure that we don't have continual cost overruns, missed schedules, missed budgets and so forth.

"...We're bubbling up ideas from the field, as well," James continued. "We're listening to our airmen and implementing some of their ideas on how to become more efficient."

James said her favorite Air Force efficiency initiative is called the "'Stop Doing Stuff' campaign.

"That is to say, we are rigorously going through our Air Force Instructions and we're trying to figure out, 'Isn't there some of this we can stop doing?'" she said.

On the contracting side, the Air Force is trying to build-in "strategic agility," which would allow the service to speed up production and cut costs in its new contracts, James said.

"So we're building-in principles like affordability right from the get-go. Let's talk about a price point right from the get-go, build it in, hold to it," she explained.

FORUM SPEECH


11/15/2014 04:18 PM CST

Navy Vice Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, makes remarks during the Reagan National Defense Forum at The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif., Nov. 15, 2014.